The Edo State governor, Adams Oshiomhole, has again reacted to claims
by the former Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, that his
insistence on probity and respect for due process over the controversial
disbursement of $2 billion from the excess crude revenue account was
persecution to tarnish her image.
Following the recent allegation by Mr. Oshiomhole that Mrs.
Okonjo-Iweala illegally withdrew about $1 billion from the ECA to
prosecute former President Goodluck Jonathan’s re-election bid, her
spokesperson, Paul Nwabuikwu, had dismissed it as a “ludicrously false
statement that has unfortunately become a trademark of the governor in
his public campaign of falsehood against Dr Okonjo-Iweala.”
“The statement is just another example of the numerical diarrhoea
that seems to have afflicted His Excellency in recent times in his
effort to damage the reputation of the former Minister,” Mr. Nwabuikwu
said. “Governor Oshiomhole’s repeated attacks against Okonjo-Iweala
indicate that he took the Minister’s rejection of the application very
personally.”
One Undung Pam widely circulated an article Wednesday claiming that
the real reason for the governor’s action was the former minister’s
refusal in 2014 to approve a “Letter of no Objection” for loan requests
by Edo State government totalling N5.19 billion from EcoBank and
Fidelity Bank.
However, in a reaction, Mr. Oshiomhole’s spokesperson, Kassim
Afegbua, who denied anything “personal” between the governor and Mrs.
Okonjo-Iweala, said such claims were cheap blackmail to avoid addressing
the contradictions in her responses on the allegations.
For Mr. Oshiomhole, the questions to answer were how accruals in ECA
got depleted without the knowledge of the National Economic Council; how
monies that were supposed to accrue in the ECA was not captured in the
balance sheet presented by the former minister, who unilaterally removed
from the money from the ECA in defiance of the constitution.
“How come the minister finds it convenient to publish allocations to
states and local governments, but refused to publish accruals into the
same account for us to know the status of the account at any point in
time; how much was left from where she was distributing from?” Mr.
Oshiomhole asked.
He said what he highlighted was that by December 2012, the ECA had a
balance of over $10billion, which the former Minister said has been
depleted to $2.07billion by May 2015, despite evidence that the last
time money was shared from the account was May 2013.
Wondering why there were no accruals in the ECA between 2011 and 2014
when crude oil prices averaged between $100 and $108, and the national
budgets was based on $77 and $79 benchmark respectively, Mr. Oshiomhole
said at an average gain of $30 per barrel, Nigeria should have earned
about $30billion from daily export of 2.3 million barrels of oil.
“The question Okonjo-Iweala could not answer is: how come Nigeria did
not make any savings during those three years of unprecedented oil
price boom?” Mr. Oshiomhole said.
On the former minister’s claim that she was being persecuted by the
allegation, the governor said rather than blame others, she should blame
herself for claiming that Mr. Jonathan approved the withdrawal for fuel
subsidy payment to petroleum products marketers.
“Does the president have the right and powers under our (Nigerian)
laws to give approval for the withdrawal of $2billion from the ECA?” Mr.
Oshiomhole asked. “Does the President have the power to usurp the
powers of NEC with respect to withdrawals from the ECA? Does the
President have the powers to touch any money that belongs to the States
and Local Governments?”
Citing the instance of the $5billion Power Intervention Fund, Mr.
Oshiomhole said due process was followed, with all the 36 state
governors present at the NEC that approved withdrawal from the ECA,
apart from authorization the state Houses of Assembly, Local Government
Chairmen and their Legislative Councils.
“Just waking up in the morning to declare that “Mr. President” gave
the approval and it was used to pay subsidy claims flies in the face of
logic, common sense, due process and law,” Mr. Oshiomhole argued.
“Why would a minister that is worth her salt dip her hands into our
collective patrimony to take a whopping $2billion on the directives of
one Mr. President? Can any World Bank Chief Executive dip hands into the
till to take what belongs to all vide approval against what the laws
and rules guiding World Bank specify?”
He said Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala’s resort to blackmail using her refusal to
grant Edo State government a loan request as reason for his demands for
probity and respect for due process borders on fraud and financial
recklessness was completely at variance with the real issues at stake.
No comments:
Post a Comment